MSME Contract Protection: Payment Terms and Legal Rights 2026

India's 63 million MSMEs contribute nearly 30% of the nation's GDP, yet delayed payments remain one of the single biggest threats to their survival. According to a 2025 CIBIL-SIDBI study, over Rs 10.7 lakh crore in MSME receivables were overdue at any given time, choking working capital and forcing thousands of small enterprises into insolvency each year.

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act) was designed to fix exactly this problem. It created a statutory framework that caps payment timelines, mandates compound interest on delays, and establishes dedicated dispute resolution councils. Yet many MSMEs remain unaware of the protections available to them, and many buyers draft contracts that quietly sidestep these mandatory provisions.

This guide covers everything MSME owners and procurement teams need to know: the legal framework, practical clause drafting, enforcement mechanisms, and how to stay compliant on both sides of the table.

Understanding the MSMED Act 2006: The Foundation of MSME Payment Protection

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is the primary legislation governing payment terms in MSME transactions. While the Act covers classification, promotion, and facilitation of MSMEs broadly, Chapter V (Sections 15 to 24) is the critical section dealing with delayed payments.

Who Qualifies as an MSME?

Following the revised classification notified on 1 June 2020 (and subsequently updated), MSME status is determined by investment in plant and machinery or equipment and annual turnover:

| Category | Investment Ceiling | Turnover Ceiling | |---|---|---| | Micro Enterprise | Up to Rs 1 crore | Up to Rs 5 crore | | Small Enterprise | Up to Rs 10 crore | Up to Rs 50 crore | | Medium Enterprise | Up to Rs 50 crore | Up to Rs 250 crore |

Registration is done through the Udyam Registration portal (udyamregistration.gov.in), which replaced the earlier UAM system. A valid Udyam Registration Number (URN) is essential for invoking MSMED Act protections.

The Buyer-Supplier Relationship Under the Act

Section 2(b) of the MSMED Act defines "buyer" as any entity that buys goods or receives services from a micro, small, or medium enterprise. This includes:

• Private companies and public listed companies
• Government departments and PSUs
• Other MSMEs (when purchasing from a smaller MSME)
• Partnership firms, LLPs, and sole proprietorships
• Any other body corporate

The definition is intentionally broad. If you procure from an entity holding a valid Udyam Registration, the MSMED Act payment provisions apply to you.

The 45-Day Payment Rule: Section 15 Explained

Section 15 of the MSMED Act is the cornerstone provision. It states:

Where any supplier supplies any goods or renders any services to any buyer, the buyer shall make payment therefor on or before the date agreed upon between him and the supplier in writing or, where there is no agreement in this behalf, before the appointed day.

The "appointed day" is defined under Section 2(b) as the day following the period of fifteen days from the day of acceptance or deemed acceptance of goods or services. However, the proviso to Section 15 sets the outer limit:

Provided that in no event the period agreed upon between the supplier and the buyer in writing shall exceed forty-five days from the day of acceptance or the day of deemed acceptance.

Breaking Down the Timeline

1. Acceptance or deemed acceptance — The clock starts when the buyer accepts the goods/services, or when deemed acceptance occurs (typically after a reasonable inspection period, usually 15 days from delivery unless otherwise agreed).
2. No written agreement — Payment must be made within 15 days of acceptance.
3. Written agreement exists — Payment can be up to 45 days from acceptance, but never beyond 45 days.

What Happens If the Contract Says 60 Days or 90 Days?

This is where many procurement teams get caught. A contract clause stating "payment within 60 days" or "payment within 90 days from invoice date" is void to the extent it exceeds 45 days when the supplier is a registered MSME.

The Supreme Court in Silpi Industries v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (2021) reinforced that statutory payment timelines under the MSMED Act override contractual terms. The buyer cannot contract out of these protections.

This means even if both parties willingly signed a contract with 90-day terms, the MSME supplier retains the right to claim interest from Day 46 onwards.

Try LexiReview Free

Interest on Delayed Payments: Section 16

Section 16 prescribes the penalty for late payment, and it is deliberately severe:

Where any buyer fails to make payment of the amount to the supplier, as required under section 15, the buyer shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any agreement between the buyer and the supplier or in any law for the time being in force, be liable to pay compound interest with monthly rests to the supplier on that amount from the appointed day or, as the case may be, from the date immediately following the date agreed upon, at three times of the bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank.

Calculating the Interest

The formula is straightforward but the numbers are punishing:

• Bank Rate (2026): The RBI bank rate as of early 2026 stands at 6.75%.
• Applicable Rate: 3 x 6.75% = 20.25% per annum
• Compounding: Monthly rests (compound interest calculated monthly)

For a Rs 10 lakh invoice delayed by 6 months beyond the 45-day limit, the interest liability works out to approximately Rs 1.05 lakh. For larger invoices or longer delays, the numbers escalate rapidly.

Key Characteristics of Section 16 Interest

• Mandatory and non-waivable — The phrase "notwithstanding anything contained in any agreement" means the parties cannot contractually waive or reduce this interest rate.
• Compound interest — Not simple interest, but compounding monthly, making delays exponentially more expensive.
• No deduction allowed — The buyer cannot deduct TDS on this interest component (it is penal in nature, not income).
• Tax treatment for buyers — Under Section 23 of the MSMED Act, the interest paid on delayed payments is not deductible as a business expenditure under the Income Tax Act. This is a double penalty — you pay the interest and cannot claim it as an expense.

MSME Samadhaan: The Online Filing Mechanism

The Ministry of MSME launched the MSME Samadhaan portal (samadhaan.msme.gov.in) as a facilitation mechanism for delayed payment disputes. Here is how the process works:

Step 1: Filing on the Portal

Any MSME supplier with a valid Udyam Registration can file an application online against any buyer for delayed payment. The application requires:

• Udyam Registration Number
• Details of the buyer (name, address, GSTIN)
• Invoice details (number, date, amount)
• Proof of supply (delivery challans, acknowledgment receipts)
• Payment terms (contract extract or purchase order)
• Amount claimed (principal + interest)

Step 2: Referral to Facilitation Council

The application is forwarded to the Micro and Small Enterprise Facilitation Council (MSEFC) having jurisdiction. Each state and union territory is required to constitute at least one MSEFC.

Step 3: Conciliation and Arbitration

The MSEFC first attempts conciliation. If conciliation fails, the Council acts as an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Council must dispose of the application within 90 days from the date of reference, extendable by a further period not exceeding 90 days.

Step 4: Award and Enforcement

The award passed by the MSEFC is enforceable as a decree of a civil court. Critically, under Section 19 of the MSMED Act, no application for setting aside the award can be entertained by any court unless the buyer has deposited 75% of the awarded amount.

The Facilitation Council Process: What to Expect

Jurisdiction

The MSEFC where the supplier is located has jurisdiction. This is a significant advantage for MSME suppliers — they do not need to travel to the buyer's jurisdiction to pursue their claim.

Pre-deposit Requirement for Challenging Awards

Under Section 19, if a buyer wants to challenge an MSEFC award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, the buyer must first deposit 75% of the awarded amount with the Facilitation Council. This pre-deposit requirement is one of the most powerful protections in the Act, as it prevents buyers from using litigation as a delay tactic.

Limitation Period

Applications to the MSEFC must be filed within three years from the date the payment became due. However, do not wait — filing early preserves evidence and demonstrates diligence.

Recent Judicial Interpretation

In M/s Regen Powertech Pvt. Ltd. v. Anjani Technoplast Ltd. and subsequent High Court decisions, courts have consistently held that:

• MSEFC jurisdiction is mandatory and not optional — buyers cannot insist on arbitration under a separate contractual clause when MSMED Act provisions apply.
• The 75% pre-deposit requirement is non-negotiable and applies even to government buyers.
• Time spent in conciliation does not count towards the limitation period.

Try LexiReview Free

Buyer Obligations: Disclosure and Compliance

Mandatory Disclosure Under the Companies Act

The Companies Act, 2013 (Schedule III, as amended) requires every company to disclose in its annual financial statements:

• Principal amount owed to micro and small enterprises that is outstanding for more than 45 days
• Interest due on the above amount
• Interest paid during the year under Section 16 of the MSMED Act
• Payment made beyond the appointed day during the year along with interest paid
• Amount of interest accrued and unpaid at the end of the year
• Amount of further interest remaining due and payable in succeeding years

This disclosure is now a standard note in audited financial statements. Auditors specifically verify MSME payables and flag non-compliance.

GST Implications

Under Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act (inserted by Finance Act 2023, effective from AY 2024-25), buyers who fail to pay MSME suppliers within the statutory timeline lose the tax deduction for that expense in the relevant financial year. The deduction is only allowed in the year of actual payment.

This provision transformed MSME payment compliance from a contractual issue to a direct tax liability issue, prompting many large corporates to overhaul their procurement payment processes.

Practical Impact on Procurement Teams

Procurement teams at large corporates, PSUs, and government departments must now:

1. Verify MSME status of every supplier at onboarding (check Udyam Registration)
2. Configure ERP payment cycles to ensure MSME invoices are processed within 45 days
3. Monitor payables aging with specific MSME filters
4. Report to auditors with accurate data on MSME outstanding amounts
5. Train AP teams on the consequences of delayed MSME payments

How to Draft MSME-Compliant Payment Clauses

Whether you are an MSME supplier protecting your rights or a buyer ensuring compliance, payment clauses in MSME contracts need specific attention. Below are practical clause-drafting guidelines.

For Buyers: Compliant Payment Clause Template

Here is a model clause that ensures compliance:

PAYMENT TERMS

1. The Buyer shall make payment to the Supplier within [30/45] days from the
   date of acceptance of goods/services or the date of deemed acceptance,
   whichever is earlier.

2. "Deemed acceptance" shall occur on the expiry of [15] days from the date
   of delivery/completion, unless the Buyer communicates written rejection
   with specific reasons within such period.

3. The Supplier confirms that it holds Udyam Registration Number [URN]
   under the MSMED Act, 2006. The payment terms herein shall be read in
   conformity with Chapter V of the MSMED Act, 2006.

4. In the event of delayed payment beyond the period stipulated in Clause 1
   above, the Buyer acknowledges its liability to pay compound interest at
   three times the bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank of India,
   compounded monthly, in accordance with Section 16 of the MSMED Act, 2006.

5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, no payment term
   herein shall exceed the maximum period permitted under Section 15 of the
   MSMED Act, 2006.

For MSME Suppliers: Protective Clause Additions

MSME suppliers should insist on including the following provisions:

MSME PAYMENT PROTECTIONS

1. The Supplier is a registered Micro/Small/Medium Enterprise under the
   MSMED Act, 2006 (Udyam Registration No: [___]). All payment obligations
   under this Agreement are subject to Chapter V of the MSMED Act, 2006.

2. The Buyer acknowledges that payment beyond 45 days from acceptance or
   deemed acceptance shall attract compound interest under Section 16 of the
   MSMED Act, 2006, notwithstanding any contrary provision in this Agreement.

3. The Buyer shall not require the Supplier to waive, defer, or reduce any
   rights under the MSMED Act, 2006 as a condition of this Agreement or any
   future business relationship.

4. Any dispute regarding payment shall be referred to the Micro and Small
   Enterprise Facilitation Council under Section 18 of the MSMED Act, 2006,
   which shall have exclusive jurisdiction.

5. The Buyer shall include the Supplier's MSME status in its records for the
   purposes of disclosure under Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013 and
   Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Clauses to Avoid (Red Flags for Both Parties)

Watch out for these problematic clauses:

• "Payment within 90/120 days from invoice date" — Void to the extent it exceeds 45 days for MSME suppliers.
• "Interest on delayed payment shall be at [X]% per annum" — Cannot override the statutory 3x bank rate.
• "All disputes shall be referred to arbitration at [buyer's city]" — MSEFC jurisdiction cannot be ousted by contract.
• "Supplier waives all claims under the MSMED Act" — Such waivers are void as contrary to a beneficial statute.
• "Payment subject to receipt of payment from end-client" — Pay-when-paid clauses do not override the 45-day statutory mandate.

Recent Amendments and Developments (2024-2026)

Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act

Effective from Assessment Year 2024-25, this provision disallows deduction of any sum payable to micro or small enterprises unless actually paid within the time limit under Section 15 of the MSMED Act. This single amendment has done more to improve MSME payment timelines than a decade of enforcement efforts.

Key clarifications issued by CBDT:

• The provision applies to all payments for goods and services, not just contractual amounts.
• It covers both existing and new contracts.
• The disallowance is reversed in the year of actual payment, but the cash flow impact on the buyer is immediate.

Digital Monitoring and TReDS

The Trade Receivables Discounting System (TReDS), mandated by RBI, allows MSMEs to finance their receivables through an online platform. Companies with turnover exceeding Rs 500 crore are now required to onboard on TReDS platforms.

The three operational TReDS platforms — RXIL, M1xchange, and Invoicemart — have collectively processed over Rs 1.5 lakh crore in MSME invoice discounting as of early 2026. This ecosystem works alongside MSMED Act protections to improve MSME cash flows.

The MSME Development (Amendment) Bill

The proposed amendments (under consideration as of 2026) seek to:

• Extend Facilitation Council protections to medium enterprises for delayed payment disputes
• Introduce penalties for repeat offenders
• Mandate digital payment tracking for all MSME transactions above a threshold
• Strengthen the enforcement mechanism for MSEFC awards

Key Case Law (2024-2026)

Several significant judicial pronouncements have strengthened MSME payment protections:

1. Gujarat State Fertilizers v. MSEFC Gujarat (2025) — The Gujarat High Court held that PSUs cannot claim sovereign immunity to avoid MSEFC jurisdiction, and the 75% pre-deposit requirement applies uniformly.

2. Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. Micro Enterprise Facilitation Council (2024) — The Supreme Court reiterated that the MSMED Act is a beneficial statute to be interpreted in favour of the supplier, and that contractual arbitration clauses do not override MSEFC jurisdiction.

3. Infosys BPM Ltd. v. MSEFC Bangalore (2025) — Clarified that IT services contracts with MSME vendors are fully covered under the MSMED Act, dismissing the buyer's argument that the Act applies only to manufacturing.

Try LexiReview Free

Compliance Checklist for Buyers

Use this checklist to audit your MSME payment compliance posture:

1. Supplier MSME verification — Do you verify Udyam Registration status for all new suppliers?
2. Payment term configuration — Are MSME supplier invoices flagged for processing within 45 days in your ERP?
3. Acceptance protocol — Do you have a documented goods/services acceptance process that avoids deemed acceptance disputes?
4. Interest tracking — Can your finance team calculate and provision for Section 16 interest on any overdue MSME payable?
5. Financial disclosure — Are MSME payable disclosures in your annual accounts accurate and complete?
6. Section 43B(h) compliance — Has your tax team incorporated MSME payment tracking into year-end tax computations?
7. Contract clause review — Have your standard procurement contracts been updated to comply with MSMED Act timelines?
8. TReDS onboarding — If your turnover exceeds Rs 500 crore, are you registered on a TReDS platform?
9. Training — Have your procurement, accounts payable, and legal teams been trained on MSME payment obligations?
10. Dispute response protocol — Do you have a process for responding to Samadhaan complaints and MSEFC notices?

Compliance Checklist for MSME Suppliers

MSME suppliers should ensure:

1. Udyam Registration is current — Check that your registration is active and classification is accurate.
2. Contracts reference MSMED Act — Every supply agreement should expressly reference your MSME status and the Act.
3. Invoices include URN — Print your Udyam Registration Number on all invoices and delivery challans.
4. Maintain acceptance records — Keep proof of delivery, acceptance communications, and deemed acceptance timelines.
5. Track payment timelines — Monitor the 45-day clock from the date of acceptance for every invoice.
6. File promptly on Samadhaan — Do not delay filing when payments are overdue beyond 45 days.
7. Calculate interest correctly — Use the compound interest formula with monthly rests at 3x the bank rate.
8. Preserve evidence — Keep copies of contracts, POs, invoices, delivery proofs, and all payment communications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an MSME supplier and buyer mutually agree to payment terms longer than 45 days?▾

No. Section 15 of the MSMED Act explicitly states that the agreed payment period shall in no event exceed 45 days from acceptance or deemed acceptance. Any agreement exceeding this limit is void to the extent of the excess. Even if both parties willingly sign a contract with 60-day or 90-day terms, the MSME supplier retains the statutory right to claim compound interest from Day 46. This ceiling is non-negotiable and overrides contractual freedom.

What is the current interest rate on delayed MSME payments in 2026?▾

The interest rate is three times the bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank of India, compounded monthly. As of early 2026, the RBI bank rate is 6.75%, making the applicable rate 20.25% per annum with monthly compounding. This rate adjusts automatically whenever the RBI changes the bank rate. Importantly, this interest cannot be reduced by agreement between the parties, and the buyer cannot claim an income tax deduction on the interest paid under Section 23 of the MSMED Act.

Does the MSMED Act apply to government departments and PSUs?▾

Yes, absolutely. The definition of "buyer" under the MSMED Act includes any entity that procures goods or services from an MSME, with no exemption for government bodies, PSUs, or autonomous institutions. Multiple High Court and Supreme Court decisions have confirmed that government buyers are fully subject to MSMED Act payment obligations, including the 75% pre-deposit requirement for challenging Facilitation Council awards. Government procurement policies like the Public Procurement Policy for MSEs further reinforce these obligations.

Can a buyer challenge the Facilitation Council's award?▾

A buyer can file an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to set aside the MSEFC award. However, under Section 19 of the MSMED Act, no court shall entertain such an application unless the buyer has deposited 75% of the awarded amount (including interest) with the Facilitation Council. This pre-deposit requirement is mandatory and has been upheld consistently by courts. It effectively prevents buyers from using litigation as a stalling tactic.

What happens if an MSME supplier does not have Udyam Registration?▾

Without a valid Udyam Registration, the enterprise cannot invoke the protections of Chapter V of the MSMED Act, including the 45-day payment ceiling and compound interest provisions. The supplier also cannot file on the Samadhaan portal or approach the Facilitation Council. However, unregistered MSMEs can still pursue payment claims through civil courts or contractual arbitration — they simply lose the special protections of the MSMED Act. Registration is free and instant on the Udyam portal, so there is no reason for any eligible enterprise to remain unregistered.

How does Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act affect buyers?▾

Section 43B(h), effective from AY 2024-25, disallows the deduction of any sum payable to a micro or small enterprise if the payment is not made within the time limit specified under Section 15 of the MSMED Act (15 days without an agreement, or up to 45 days with one). If the buyer fails to pay within this window, the expense is disallowed in that financial year for income tax purposes and is only deductible in the year of actual payment. This creates an immediate tax liability impact and has significantly motivated large corporates to prioritise MSME payments.

Can the MSME supplier waive the right to interest on delayed payment?▾

No. The interest provision under Section 16 operates "notwithstanding anything contained in any agreement." A waiver clause in a contract purporting to release the buyer from interest liability is void as it contradicts a mandatory statutory provision. The MSMED Act is classified as a beneficial legislation, and courts have held that its protections cannot be contracted away. Any buyer inserting such a waiver clause risks the clause being struck down and could face adverse inference before the Facilitation Council.

---

Conclusion: Turning MSME Payment Compliance Into a Competitive Advantage

MSME payment compliance is no longer a soft obligation buried in a 2006 statute. With Section 43B(h) creating direct tax consequences, auditors scrutinising MSME payable disclosures, and Facilitation Councils becoming more active, non-compliance carries real financial and reputational risk.

For MSME suppliers, the message is clear: register on Udyam, insist on compliant contract clauses, track your payment timelines rigorously, and file on Samadhaan without hesitation when payments are delayed.

For buyers and procurement teams, the path forward is proactive compliance — verify supplier MSME status, configure your payment systems for 45-day cycles, review existing contracts for non-compliant terms, and ensure your financial disclosures are accurate.

LexiReview automatically flags contracts that violate MSME payment timelines — catch non-compliance before it costs you. Whether you are reviewing a single vendor agreement or auditing a portfolio of procurement contracts, AI-powered analysis ensures no non-compliant clause slips through.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal questions regarding MSME payment disputes, consult a qualified legal professional.